#1 : 07/05-25 02:05 Ted Williams
Posts: 5
|
Hi everybody. I'm using an epoch script (see below) I found on this forum and I know less than nothing about creating/editing the scripts.
Can someone tell me the change that is needed to add 5 hours to the time? Thanks for your assistance. File name: 1746299268259420 converts to: 20250503_0914 should be: 20250503_1414 (file created 5/3/2025 2:14PM) epoch = app.parseTags("<UnixTimestamp Modified>"); dat = new Date(1000 * epoch); return dat.getFullYear().toString() + ("0" + (dat.getMonth() + 1)).slice(-2) + ("0" + dat.getDate()).slice(-2) + "_" + ("0" + dat.getHours()).slice(-2) + ("0" + dat.getMinutes()).slice(-2); name = item.newBasename.match(/(.*_)(.*_)(.*_)(\d{10})(_.*)/); dat = new Date(1000 * parseInt(name[4])); return name[2] + dat.getFullYear() + "-" + ("0" + dat.getMonth()).slice(-2) + "-" + ("0" + dat.getDate()).slice(-2) + "_" + ("0" + dat.getHours()).slice(-2) + "-" + ("0" + dat.getMinutes()).slice(-2) + "-" + ("0" + dat.getSeconds()).slice(-2) + name[5]; |
#2 : 07/05-25 03:38 Delta Foxtrot
Posts: 475
|
Reply to #1:
Hi Ted, Welcome back, and, by the way, congratulations on that whole Boston tunnel thing. Good work! :) The simplest way, I think, is simply to use the adjustment parameter in the <UnixTimestamp Modified> tag. I can't swear to it, but 30 seconds of testing leads me to believe if you change the line: epoch = app.parseTags("<UnixTimestamp Modified>"); to: epoch = app.parseTags("<UnixTimestamp Modified:+5h>"); that may fix your hour problem (and save you a lot of sweat that Kim has already put in taking into account changing days and years in the adjustment). This page: https://www.advancedrenamer.com/user_guide/v4/ta gs_datetimemodified at the bottom says all these date/time tags in the latest version of ARen are adjustable to take into account this kind of thing. This page: https://www.advancedrenamer.com/user_guide/v4/ta gs_datetime#adjusting-output-value describes the adjustments that can be made. Good luck! Best, DF |
#3 : 07/05-25 03:43 Delta Foxtrot
Posts: 475
|
Reply to #2:
Oh, if for some reason that doesn't give you the correct time you can probably do something like: epoch = app.parseTags("<UnixTimestamp Modified>"); dat = ( new Date(1000 * epoch) + ( 5 * 3600) ) ; I suspect (but can't guarantee) that will work. Cheers! EDIT: Tried it; didn't work... anyway, the first method seems to work. BTW, did you mix two scripts together in your example? There are two returns with no qualifying "if" statement. I don't really understand, and it's been a while since I've had to deal with anything like that. |
#4 : 07/05-25 04:14 Delta Foxtrot
Posts: 475
|
Reply to #3:
Couldn't you also just use a NEW NAME method with: <Date Modified:yyyymmdd_hhnnss:+5h> ? |